城市服務(wù)業(yè)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)選擇及發(fā)展對(duì)策——以合肥市為例

摘要： 以合肥市為例,從科技創(chuàng)新、區(qū)域影響力、行業(yè)成長(zhǎng)性和區(qū)域比較優(yōu)勢(shì)4個(gè)維度構(gòu)建城市服務(wù)業(yè)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)評(píng)價(jià)體系,并用加權(quán)求和方法構(gòu)建評(píng)價(jià)模型,確定城市服務(wù)業(yè)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)。結(jié)果表明:合肥市各服務(wù)業(yè)門(mén)類(lèi)在科技創(chuàng)新、區(qū)域影響力、行業(yè)成長(zhǎng)性和區(qū)域比較優(yōu)勢(shì)方面表現(xiàn)各有差異;最終篩選的服務(wù)業(yè)主導(dǎo)產(chǎn)業(yè)包括科學(xué)研究和技術(shù)服務(wù)業(yè),信息傳輸、軟件和信息技術(shù)服務(wù)業(yè),金融業(yè),衛(wèi)生和社會(huì)工作,教育,公共管理、社會(huì)保障和社會(huì)組織,文化、體育和娛樂(lè)業(yè)。與傳統(tǒng)研究方法相比,該方法需要數(shù)據(jù)量少,更容易操作,對(duì)城市規(guī)劃和管理具有一定的借鑒意義。
This paper constructs the evaluation system of leading industry of service industry from four dimensions of scientific and technological innovation, regional influence, industry growth and regional comparative advantage, and determines the leading industry of service industry by weighted calculation. Taking Hefei as an example, the results show that: Firstly,Hefei's various service industry categories have different performances in terms of technological innovation, regional influence, industry growth and regional comparative advantages. Secondly, the selected leading industries of service industry in Hefei included scientific research and technical service industry, information transmission, software and information technology, technical services, financial industry, health and social work, education, public administration, social security and social organizations, culture, sports and entertainment. It can be concluded that the evaluation model used in the paper has the characteristics of less data requirement and easier operation, and is a positive reference for urban planning and management.